420 SMOKE WEED ERRYDAY

Ironic that when the Founders did not anticipate the emergence of political parties. They believed that all Americans would vote as a single block of Americans. But many of them would live--and be active politicans-- in an America wildly different than the one they originally planned.

Which is made worse by the fact that somewhere along the line politician became a career option. This was never what the Founding Fathers had in mind either. Serving as an elected official was something a productive citizen did for a period of time. After which, he went back to being a productive citizen.

there are a lot of democratic countries with 2 major parties and theyre not as fucked up as America. your problem is that people in your country are stupid.

>>125
You are being sarcastic... right?

>>186
Not stupid, lazy and ignorant, which is actually worse, since you can't really undo stupid.

>>167 Owned.

http://pnhp.org/blog/2009/11/01/what-role-insurance-companie/
Who's the conspiracy theorist now?

tl;dr

>>175 You. Lol, a blog written by a fellow conspiracist, impressive.

Try a peer reviewed nuetral source next time...oh wait, there aren't any that support whack job delusions.

First two posts in the thread could not be more accurate. Then again americans in particular are absolutely retarded, so you may as well be trying to explain quantum theory to an ant.

crazy prude = lou dobbs =cnn

true neutral = pat Buchanan =msnbc

I think the Neutral Ass might be the Schaffley boy (sp?), the guy who runs the Conservepedia.

another stupid ass

Nobel Prize for the most full of shit politician ever! Way to go Obama.

The only reason the connies are so butthurt over this is because the Nobel folks rained all over their gloat party after Obama lost the Olympic bid for Chi-town, to Rio.
Connies hate it when things don't go their way, and here they get their cheers for Obama's Olympic failure drowned out by the heraldic trumpets of a Nobel award. The tantrums from the right over this gesture were just wonderful to behold: spoilt brats are so *cyoot* when they're hissy.
The Constitution says that Obama, as a sitting POTUS, cannot personally accept the Nobel or any other foreign prize while in office. Does he deserve the medal? Who cares? It's the Euro's prize to give, so it's their business.

WHY DO ALL DEMS LUV FAG THRASH ?? if ya think that its ok to teach children that its ok for a man to f___k another man is ok""" well it seems ta me that your part of whats WRONG WITH THIS WORLD MOAR OVER THE U S A . PS I STILL CANT under stand how the people could elect a _ _ _ _ _ ta run the show wow

Ok, that post took almost as much imagination as the shirt in OP pic.

I'll keep this short and simple, your post, SamusK, is near-idiotic. The only 'supposed' fact you wanted to point out to substantiate your intent was the size of his fence being too big for local law? You point out his apparent lack of education, and lack of research effort without any facts to support your claims. Please Reinforce such points with facts, nobody likes a know-it-all. I'm not an avid GB watcher, nor a fan, (see my following point).
So I don't really know much about him to tell you if you're wrong or not. I do know that I wouldn't ever buy such a weakly reinforced argument from you or anybody.

The bigger reason I'm compelled to post this is that I've become deeply suspicious of both "sides", or any "side" for that matter. It doesn't matter if it's Glenn Beck, or Chris Matthews, they're merely puppets spewing opinion and influence. Yes, puppets. These worldwide news channels, and talk show hosts, and op eds exist with the purpose of design!
The "design" is for a rich, ruling class of EVERY society to maintain a veil-of-deception which shall keep it's working and poor class deceived and discorded enough to never have the ability to unite and revolt against its leadership. Racism, sexism, and most forms of ignorant notion and arrogant presumption exist because they're reinforced by that good ol' boob-tube on the wall.

The facts to support these claims are self evident. Just watch both sides argue. Do your best to listen first, before you follow your impulse to take a side. You will be amazed with how the words you receive from "THEM" will attempt to "steer" your thoughts to their point... don't let them do the driving....

We're meant to hate each other, and cling to racist notions, and to be fearful and paranoid of ludicrous things, by design of a handful of minds who think their human-quality is somehow superior to yours.

And most of us buy this bullshit by the barrel, daily...

except for you, master of interwebs

>>136
Well, I was hoping to include you too! But you had to go and make me master of interwebs didn't ya? Now I'm master of interwebs! I'm above this shit! I'm out!

bowing out gracefully, clearly over it.

WHAT A STUPID ASS

I am requesting a full explanation on how Republicans hate freedom and how democrats support freedom. I am new to the political scene.

>>101
Republicans aren't really hateful of freedom per-se, they just don't want to share freedom with people they don't like, or that they're paid to keep oppressed for whatever reason. They love freedom to pieces, so long as they themselves are the sole beneficiaries of that freedom. But when non-conservative types get to enjoy that same liberty, sudden the concept of freedom isn't so sacred any more.
http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/09/gop-senators-net-neutrality/

What are some more examples or another source I could look at(I am bad at browsing)? A person cannot fairly judge a person let alone a whole group on one example from one voice.

>>115 lol
just an example of how fascist the right wing is and how the left not only founded most of our rights, civil liberites, and freedoms, but are still fighting for them today against the totalitarianism of the right:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090923/ap_on_go_co/us_patriot_act

>>98
>Republicans don't like stem cell not conservatives
fix'd

>>114
Sorry I meant to put provides and not proves.

Too tired to give an accurate explanation right now will need to get to that after some sleep

>>117
I do believe this writing covers the negative rights thing quite nicely.
http://dgzotz.newsvine.com/_news/2008/08/29/1803183-the-constitution-a-guarantee-of-negative-rights

Also, the Bill of Rights ARE negative rights.

The problem Liberals have with the Bill of Rights is that the Bill of Rights ARE negative rights. In simpler terms, they complain about how the Bill of Rights only tells them what the government can NOT do to you and says nothing about what the government CAN do to.

Re: "Nevative rights".
Feh. Like "intellectual dishonesty", this seems an overwrought and un-necessary term. I reject the fad of recent years to apply compound terminology to simple concepts for the sake of pretense.
If conservatives truly believed in this concept of "negative rights" (i.e., agressive limiting of government), then they'd abandon all the invasive and imposing, morality campaigns that have become the hallmark of right-wing political agression.

>>120
Well that is because the ones in power right now are fakes with no balls to make any type of move.

>>121
What..?
Any time a one-sentence reply starts with "Well..." I know nothing much follows. Thanks for living down to my expectations.

i lol'd! how true, if you hate the US, and are against everything it stands for (freedom for instance), then vote republican because they are anti-american/freedom fascists!

Please remind of of the last Positive thing the president has said about out country.

politicians say positive things about their country all the time

>>108
the fuck does this have to do with anything?!

>>108
Please advise me as to the last negative thing Obama's said about America.
Difficulty: being honest about America's past misdeeds is no dishonor to America. Refusing to owe up to the sins our country has done is the act of the conceited and the cowardly.
Blind patriotism = treason.

#61:
Obama got elected not as some clever media trick, but because America was sick of GOP leadership. GWB was hardly worth his weight in cat piss, and Dick Cheney (who insiders admit was the *real* POTUS for those eight years) was a blue-ribbon son of a bitch.
American saw what happened in New Orleans, they saw the Terry Shaivo affair, they saw all the sneering, bullying republican assholes in the media saying basically "We're in charge so we'll do whatever we want and you can't stop us, so STFU & GBTW.". The act got old, the ghosts of 9/11 became disgustingly overused (by the GOP), America saw her global prestige, some sixty years in the making, squandered in less than a single decade by a gaggle of arrogant, selfish republican punks who did nothing to add to America's greatness. *This* is leadership? *This* is conservative values in action?
THIS is why Obama got elected on the most nebulous campaign at-least in my lifetime: no one wanted eight more years of GOP bullshit.
"You're fired!"

If it was not some media trick then, pray tell, why is he in the media so often constantly telling us things that are easily proven as lies?

>>94
If a Republican yells loudly against it, it must be a lie... Okay, I understand now.

>>95
Thank you so much for giving me that through and detailed explanation. I have been truly enlightened.

>>94
What are the lies that Obama has told? About what topics? And it's not like the GOP is %100 honest at all times themselves, is it?
Also, the old adviso, that the only time a politican isn't lying is when he's slient.

Says the people who need to send thugs into town meetings.